Throughout history, assistance for people affected by conflict and displacement has been provided by state and non-state groups across the global South. How does ‘solidarity based’ humanitarianism influence Southern led responses to displacement? In the first of our introductory mini blog series Prof. Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh presents a brief reflection on the history of internationalism and solidarity based initiatives.
This blog was posted on the 2nd April, 2018.
Internationalism and Solidarity
By Prof. Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, Principal Investigator, Southern Responses to Displacement project.
At times, state-led responses to displacement have been justified through reference to what is known as ‘South-South Cooperation’: processes through which states from the global South work together to complement one another’s abilities and resources, based on principles including ‘solidarity,’ ‘reciprocity’ and ‘mutual respect’. South-South cooperation is often seen as a way of enabling Southern actors to break down barriers and structural inequalities created by colonial powers, and is also often presented as providing an alternative mode of response to that implemented by powerful Northern states and Northern-led organisations.
With most refugees around the world remaining in the global South – typically in countries neighbouring their countries of origin – Southern states such as Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Iraq, have hosted millions of refugees for many years, often decades.
However, in addition to being ‘host states’, states from the global South also have a long history of supporting refugees in many other ways.
For instance, the countries of the Gulf have a long history of providing financial donations and material aid to refugees and people affected by tsunamis, earthquakes around the world, including through state-led faith based humanitarianism.
In turn, countries including Cuba, Venezuela and Brazil have funded and delivered medical assistance for refugees and people affected by disasters through sending internationalist medical brigades to refugee camps in North Africa, the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa and to internally displaced people across the Caribbean.
Countries as diverse as Cuba, Libya and Malaysia have developed international scholarship programmes and schools to provide secondary and university-level educations from refugees from across the Middle East and North Africa. As these and other case studies following the 2011 Arab Spring demonstrate, states from the South are more than either ‘donor states’ or ‘host states’: they often provide other kinds of assistance, with different motivations.
‘Solidarity based’ humanitarianism, as seen in Southern responses to forced displacement from Syria since 2011, has been demonstrated to stem, partly, from a will to enhance and strengthen the bond of unity and solidarity amongst Muslim peoples and states, including those states which belong to the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.
However, solidarity based humanitarianism is not limited to faith-based expressions of solidarity. For example, the Brazilian President Rousseff, explained that Brazil’s response to the 2010 Haitian earthquake was a cooperative effort to support ‘brother and sister countries’ (Rousseff 2011).
And, indeed, it is not only states that act ‘in solidarity’ with refugees – local communities and members of civil society have also often explained that they offer protection and assistance to refugees out of solidarity, whether based on principles of faith or a commitment to promoting social justice. These include Tunisian civil society support for refugees displaced by the 2011 conflict in Libya, Lebanese community responses to refugees from Syria (including ‘The Wall of Kindness’ in Beirut, shown below) and the assistance provided by established Palestinian refugees in Lebanon to ‘newly’ displaced people from Syria.
From these examples it is possible to demonstrate that ‘solidarity based’ humanitarianism operates on a number of levels, ranging from state-led initiatives to civil society and refugee-refugee action and support.
The Southern Responses to Displacement project aims to examine these and other forms of response by states and civil society which are guided by principles such as ‘solidarity’ and ‘reciprocity’. In particular, it aims to examine how refugees from Syria themselves conceptualise of these forms of response: Do they refer to them as “humanitarian” responses, or political or religious imperatives? Do they consider them to be ‘alternatives’ to the assistance programmes funded and delivered by Northern states and NGOs?
Read the rest of our mini blog series:
Southern Responses to Displacement: Background and introduction to our mini blog series: This blog introduces our mini blog series and gives an overview of the background to the Southern Responses to Displacement project and the approaches used to better understand the motivations, nature and impacts of Southern-led initiatives to displacement from Syria.
Faith-Based Humanitarianism: Our second introductory mini blog provides a brief over view of how local faith communities are often the first responders to communities affected by conflict and displacement.
Refugee-Refugee Humanitarianism Our third introductory mini blog examines how first responders in contexts of displacement are themselves often refugees. Our third introductory mini blog examines how a focus on refugee-refugee humanitarianism makes it possible to recognise and meaningfully engage with the agency of displaced populations.
Pan-Arabism: Our fourth and final introductory mini blog discusses how Pan-Arabist approaches to displacement can present an alternative to dominant discourse that situate Northern humanitarian providers as saviours of displaced Southern populations.
Further recommended reading on Southern-led responses to displacement
The following readings provide a background on Southern-led responses to crisis – mostly conflict-induced displacement and forced migration – primarily by analysing Southern state and regional models of assistance and care in global South contexts. The studies variously examine aid provided by so-called ‘non-traditional donors’ in addition to the nature of encounters between local/refugee providers and refugee/displaced populations.
Barakat, S. and Zyck, S. (2010) “Gulf State Assistance to Conflict-Affected Environments”, The Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalisation in the Gulf States. London, LSE Report.
Binder, A., Meier, C. and Steets, J. (2010) Humanitarian Assistance: Truly Universal? A Mapping Study of Non-Western Donors, GPPi Research Paper Series, 12: 1-41.
Davey, E. (2012) New Players through Old Lenses: Why History Matters in Engaging with Southern Actors, HPG Policy Brief No. 48.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. “Southern-led responses to displacement,” in Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Daley, P. (eds.) International Handbook of South-South Relations. London: Routledge.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Daley, P. “South-South Encounters,” in Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Daley, P. (eds.) International Handbook of South-South Relations. London: Routledge.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Daley, P. (eds.) International Handbook of South-South Relations. London: Routledge.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2015 and 2017) South-South Educational Migration, Humanitarianism and Development: Views from Cuba, North Africa and the Middle East. Oxford: Routledge. *paperback published in 2017*
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Pacitto, J. (2017) “Southern-led Faith-Based Humanitarian Responses to Displacement: Insights for the Global North”, in Schewel, B. and Wilson, E (eds.) Religion and European Society: A Primer. Oxford: Wiley.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Daley, P. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of South-South Relations. London: Routledge.
Harmer, A. and Cotterell, L. (2009) Diversity in Donorship: the Changing Landscape of Official Humanitarian Aid, HPG Research Report.
Mawdsley, E. (2012) From Recipients to Donors: The Emerging Powers and the Changing Development Landscape. London: Zed Books.
Mytelka, L. (ed.) (1994) South-South Cooperation in a Global Perspective. Paris: OECD publication.
Pieterse, J. (1998) “My Paradigm or Yours? Alternative Development, Post-Development, Reflexive Development”, Development and Change, 29: 343-373.
Sezgin, Z. and Dijkeul, D. (Eds) (2016) The New Humanitarianisms in International Practice: Emerging Actors and Contested Principles. London: Routledge.
Six, C. (2009) “The Rise of Postcolonial States as Donors: a Challenge to the Development Paradigm?”, Third World Quarterly, 30 (6): 1103-1121.
Svoboda, E. and Pantuliano, S. (2015) “International and Local/Diaspora Actors in the Syria Response: A Diverging Set of Systems?”, London: HPG Working Paper, ODI.
Woods, N. (2008) “Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance”, International Affairs, 84 (6): 1205-1221.
Featured Photo: A statue celebrating Arab-Cuban connections in Havana (Cuba). (c) E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, 2015.
Reblogged this on mabisir ما بيصير.